Jump to content

Talk:AB InBev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Altria

[edit]

How much does Altria own of this company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F2:BF0D:A400:953F:FBD:A2E:8258 (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Untitled

[edit]

Interesting that Wikipedia has this listed as having a price fixing conviction yet no mention of it anywhere. Me thinks this article has been scrubbed by those who shouldn't be editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.102.82 (talk) 07:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JSE stock ticker

[edit]

Can anyone confirm the right ticker symbol for South Africa? Seems like they are listed under ANB now, and the current ANH link does not seem to work. Here is ANB ticker link https://finance.google.com/finance/company_news?q=JSE:ANB&ei=N5UzWuCnEtTa2AaJ143ABw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.2.244.193 (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corona

[edit]

Where is the history on the recent attempt to acquire Corona and the legal monopoly situation in the U.S.? Leitmotiv (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-Country Brands

[edit]

Wouldn't any brand that's sold in both the US and Canada (Labbat, Rolling Rock...) be considered "Multi-Coutry Brands"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.25.174.76 (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's the company's classification system; they have global, multi-country, and local champion brand categories. poroubalous (talk) 00:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

54%

[edit]

CXd US mkt share. Sca (talk) 22:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch pronunciation?

[edit]

The pronunciation isn't real Dutch. Then it would be pronounced like anhößer büs or something like that. I don't know the IPA letters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arndt1969 (talkcontribs) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Market Share statistic is wrong, I believe.

[edit]

I dont think they have a global market share of 25%, but can't find a reputable source to disprove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.179.3.236 (talk) 20:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anheuser-Busch InBev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major homebrew stores acquisition

[edit]

It appears that InBev has acquired Northern Brewer and Midwest Homebrew supplies, thoughts on where this should appear since it isn't a "beverage" brand or direct producer of beverages? --Debaser42 (talk) 13:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Company has merged and became Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

[edit]

See below for the revision. I have made revisions in light of the Oct. 2016 merger, but other revisions probably need to be made too. The name of the company, for example, but also in the text. I don't have time to do it all.

The merger (A-B InBev acquisition of SABMiller), closed on October 10, 2016. The new company is called Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, and is trading on the New York stock exchange as BUD (NYSE:BUD). The SABMiller name was dropped and that entity ceased trading. This new company is the world's largest beer company. Estimated annual sales would be $55 billion in and the company will have an estimated global market share of 28 percent, according to Euromonitor International. October 11, 2016 |title=A-B InBev finalizes $100B billion acquisition of SABMiller, creating world's largest beer company |url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-megabrew-ab-inbev-sabmiller-merger-20161010-story.html |newspaper=Chicago Tribune Peter K Burian (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name of Company needs to be changed

[edit]

It is now Anheuser Busch Inbev SA/NV Peter K Burian (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anheuser-Busch InBev is a Brazilian-Company?

[edit]

The original AB InBev was formed through successive mergers of three international brewing groups completed in 2008: Interbrew from Belgium, AmBev from Brazil, and Anheuser-Busch from the United States so should we call it a Brazilian-Belgium-American conglomerate?? The new holding company's headquarters are located in Leuven, Belgium and is traded in the European, Johannesburg, Mexican and New York Stock Exchanges and not in any Brazilian stock market. It is very misleading to call it a Brazilian-Belgium company when all facts point to it being a registered Belgium multinational corporation. I submit that the most accurate classification would be of a multinational company headquartered in Belgium. Can we get a senior editor to weigh in on this editing dispute? Thank you. b575 (talk) 21:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anheuser-Busch InBev is a Brazilian-Company?
No, it is not a Brazilian company, it is a Belgian-Brazilian company based in Belgium.
Its predecessor, InBev was a brewing company that resulted from the merger between Belgium-based company Interbrew and Brazilian brewer AmBev which took place in 2004. It existed independently until the acquisition of Anheuser-Busch in 2008, that formed Anheuser-Busch InBev (abbreviated AB InBev). In other hand, in 2004, AmBev merged with Belgian company Interbrew to form InBev
Placing this company as an American would not be wrong either, except that the acquisition process of Anheuser-Busch was different from that of InBev. InBev arose through a merger between two companies, which in 2008 came to acquire Anheuser-Busch, creating the ABInBev. Acquiring and merging are different concepts, for consumers this does not make any difference, but if we want to analyze the history of the company then this is relevant.
The company is not registered as Belgian, it is registered as Belgium-based company, and the company recognizes itself as Belgian-Brazilian. The choice of Belgium as the company's headquarters was due to the fact that the Belgian market is much more fluid, dynamic and open than the Brazilian market. On the issue of stock exchanges, this does not determine the nationality of the company, or is ABINBev now South African? Or are the thousands of Argentine companies no longer Argentine because they are registered on the New York Stock Exchange?
I never denied that the company was based in Belgium. but I do not understand how an additional fact, recognized by the company itself, and stated with the sources I have posted can be so absurd. I've put sources, and some research on the internet prove what is said. It is not necessary for you to post further sources stating that the company is Belgium-based, because it is not necessary to state numerous times just because you disagree with something. :And please respect the other editors, and stop inducing, accusing or undermining certain editions for pure prejudice or arrogance. I am not brazilian, I am south american but I am not a "continentalist", or a "latino lover", and I do not have and do not need other accounts to reaffirm my edition.
My point was placed with sources, arguments. And my point did not denigrate any other part of the article.
--Felipefigueiredocunha (talk) 01:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

how does Wikipedia know the politics of Bud Lite drinkers?

[edit]

how does Wikipedia know the politics of Bud Lite drinkers? 2600:1702:3580:28C0:91F5:D017:7178:1FD2 (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2023

[edit]

Removal of conservative boycott or political references to the 2023 controversy. The boycott is about keeping women women and it affects all women and men in both sides of the political spectrum. 2600:1012:B159:3C07:F526:1E4:C5AA:DE3C (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: what? Cannolis (talk) 04:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]